In Korean, the variable for each child variable cannot be manipulated.
To manipulate them, you must change the language and modify the variables.
![]()
![]()
![]()
In Korean, the variable for each child variable cannot be manipulated.
To manipulate them, you must change the language and modify the variables.
![]()
![]()
![]()
I can see the balise <5> is not well closed.
Is that better ?
<0><1><2/>{0}</1>μ λͺ¨λ μμμ λν΄, μμμ λ³μ<3><4/>{1}</3>μ μ μ₯νκ³ , μμμ μ΄λ¦μ<5><6/>{2}</5>μ μ μ₯ν λ€μ λ€μμ μνν©λλ€:</0>
Compared to the current:
<0><1><2/>{0}</1>μ λͺ¨λ μμμ λν΄ μμλ₯Ό λ³μ <3><4/>{1}</3>μ μ μ₯νκ³ μμ μ΄λ¦μ <5><6/>{2}</0>μ μ μ₯ν©λλ€
Iβm not really a proper programmer, so itβs hard for me to give a clear answer about the comments, but to avoid confusion when switching languages, I think the current version is better.
<0><1><2/>{0}</1>μ λͺ¨λ μμμ λν΄ μμλ₯Ό λ³μ <3><4/>{1}</3>μ μ μ₯νκ³ μμ μ΄λ¦μ <5><6/>{2}</0>μ μ μ₯ν©λλ€
Ok, I got it why, the 5th balise wasnβt closed on the text chain.
It will be fixed in future updates.